HUMANS WHO PROFESS TO BE SUCH “WORLD SAVIORS” AND “FREEDOM/DEMOCRATIC” SOCIETIES, NEVER SEEM TO BE ABLE TO “FIGHT BACK AGAINST” EVIL/DEMONIC/SATANIC/TYRANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE CRIMES THAT HAVE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF “CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES” OF 1/ONE MAN, AND MANY OF HIS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATES” JUST MAKE THESE “UNITED STATES OF THE BORG” APPEAR TO BE “WORLD HYPOCRITES”, “SATANIC WORSHIPERS”, AND “HISTORICAL LIARS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS”!!!

WIKIPEDIA AND WEBSTERS AND ALL TRUE/TRUTHS TELL SIMPLE LAWS/RULES/MEANINGS AND YET, “CRIMINALS THUMB THEIR NOSES AND MIDDLE FINGERS” AT LAWS AND RULES AND MEANINGS THAT A LAWFUL/FREE SOCIETY HAS ESTABLISHED AS ITS GOVERNMENTAL FORMS OF SAYING “NO ONE, OR GROUP” IS ABOVE THE LAW(S) OF THE CONSTITUTION AND OF THE LAND(S) OF THE WORLD.

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES CANNOT “SIT, WATCHING TV” AS PEOPLE SEEK FOR HIM/HER TO STOP, CALL OFF THE “VIOLENT ATTACKS UPON THE CAPITOL”, PERFORMED BY “HIS/HER OWN PUBLIC, CAUGHT/SEEN ON TV” INSTIGATION’S, OF “HIS/HER” YELLING “FIRREE”!!! IN A PUBLIC FORUM AND DIRECTING THEM TO GO “MARCH DOWN TO THE CAPITOL” AND “STOP THE STEAL”!!..VERY VERY CLEAR/SIMPLE CASE OF ” Dereliction of duty” AND “High crimes and misdemeanors”

Dereliction of duty

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dereliction_of_duty

Dereliction of duty is a specific offense under United States Code Title 10, Section 892, Article 92 and applies to all branches of the US military. A service member who is derelict has willfully refused to perform his duties (or follow a given order) or has incapacitated himself in such a way that he cannot perform his duties. Such incapacitation includes the person falling asleep while on duty requiring wakefulness, his getting drunk or otherwise intoxicated and consequently being unable to perform his duties, shooting himself and thus being unable to perform any duty, or his vacating his post contrary to regulations.

High crimes and misdemeanors

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

United States

“High crimes and misdemeanors” is a phrase from Section 4 of Article Two of the United States Constitution: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

“High,” in the legal and common parlance of the 17th and 18th centuries of “high crimes,” is activity by or against those who have special duties acquired by taking an oath of office that are not shared with common persons.^[5] A high crime is one that can be done only by someone in a unique position of authority, which is political in character, who does things to circumvent justice. The phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors,” used together, was a common phrase when the U.S. Constitution was written and did not require any stringent or difficult criteria for determining guilt but meant the opposite. The phrase was historically used to cover a very broad range of crimes.

The Judiciary Committee’s 1974 report “The Historical Origins of Impeachment” stated: “‘High Crimes and Misdemeanors’ has traditionally been considered a ‘term of art‘, like such other constitutional phrases as ‘levying war’ and ‘due process.’ The Supreme Court has held that such phrases must be construed, not according to modern usage, but according to what the framers meant when they adopted them. In 1807, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote of the phrase “levying war”:

It is a technical term. It is used in a very old statute of that country whose language is our language, and whose laws form the substratum of our laws. It is scarcely conceivable that the term was not employed by the framers of our constitution in the sense which had been affixed to it by those from whom we borrowed it.^[6][7]

Since 1386, the English parliament had used the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” to describe one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” etc.^[8]

Benjamin Franklin asserted that the power of impeachment and removal was necessary for those times when the Executive “rendered himself obnoxious,” and the Constitution should provide for the “regular punishment of the Executive when his conduct should deserve it, and for his honorable acquittal when he should be unjustly accused.” James Madison said that “impeachment… was indispensable” to defend the community against “the incapacity, negligence or perfidy of the chief Magistrate.” With a single executive, Madison argued, unlike a legislature whose collective nature provided security, “loss of capacity or corruption was more within the compass of probable events, and either of them might be fatal to the Republic.”^[9]

The process of impeaching someone in the House of Representatives and convicting in the Senate is difficult, made so to be the balance against efforts to easily remove people from office for minor reasons that could easily be determined by the standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors”. It was George Mason who offered up the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the criteria to remove public officials who abuse their office. Their original intentions can be gleaned by the phrases and words that were proposed before, such as “high misdemeanor,” “maladministration,” or “other crime.” Edmund Randolph said impeachment should be reserved for those who “misbehave.” Charles Cotesworth Pinckney said, It should be reserved “for those who behave amiss, or betray their public trust.” As can be seen from all these references to “high crimes and misdemeanors,” the definition or its rationale does not relate to specific offences. This gives a lot of freedom of interpretation to the House of Representatives and the Senate. The constitutional law by nature is not concerned with being specific. The courts through precedence and the legislature through lawmaking make constitutional provisions specific. In this case the legislature (the House of Representatives and the Senate) acts as a court and can create a precedent.

In Federalist No. 65, Alexander Hamilton said, “those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.”^[10]

The first impeachment conviction by the United States Senate was in 1804 of John Pickering, a judge of the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, for chronic intoxication. Federal judges have been impeached and removed from office for tax evasion, conspiracy to solicit a bribe, and making false statements to a grand jury.^[11]

President Andrew Johnson was impeached on February 24, 1868, in the United U.S. House of Representatives on eleven articles of impeachment detailing his “high crimes and misdemeanors”,^[12] in accordance with Article Two of the United States Constitution. (The Senate fell one vote short of conviction.) The House’s primary charge against Johnson was with violation of the Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress the previous year. Specifically, he had removed Edwin M. Stanton, the Secretary of War from office and replaced him with John Schofield, but it was unclear if Johnson had violated the act as Stanton was nominated by President Abraham Lincoln and not by Johnson.

During the impeachment of Bill Clinton in 1999, White House Counsel Charles Ruff described a “narrow” interpretation of “high crimes and misdemeanors” as requiring “a standard that the framers intentionally set at this extraordinarily high level to ensure that only the most serious offenses and in particular those that subverted our system of government would justify overturning a popular election”. Writing in 1999, Mark R. Slusar commented that the narrow interpretation seemed to be most common among legal scholars and senators.^[13]

United States Code

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Code

The Code of Laws of the United States of America^[1] (variously abbreviated to Code of Laws of the United States, United States Code, U.S. Code, U.S.C., or USC) is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal statutes of the United States.^[2] It contains 53 titles (Titles 1–54, excepting Title 53, which is reserved for a proposed title on small business).^[3][4] The main edition is published every six years by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives, and cumulative supplements are published annually.^[2][5][6] The official version of those laws not codified in the United States Code can be found in United States Statutes at Large.

UNLESS SOMEONE HAS A/THE TYPE OF “LOONEY TUNES” MENTALITY/BRAINS THAT WE SEE AND LIVE THROUGH IN TODAY’S “UNITED STATES OF THE BORG”; EVEN THE MOST “INFANT” OF BABIES, EVEN “PRIMAL BRAIN ACTIVITIES” UNDERSTANDS THE “SIMPLE LAWS AND STATUTES AND CRIMINAL CRIMES” THAT GOT COMMITTED THROUGHOUT THE HISTORY OF T-MAN AND ESPECIALLY THROUGH OUT BEFORE HIS BEING IN OFFICE, AND THROUGH HIS ADMINISTRATION, AND THAT “JANUARY 6TH, 2021” DAY…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason

Treason

Treason is the crime of attacking a state authority to which one owes allegiance.^[1] This typically includes acts such as participating in a war against one’s native country, attempting to overthrow its government, spying on its military, its diplomats, or its secret services for a hostile and foreign power, or attempting to kill its head of state. A person who commits treason is known in law as a traitor.^[2]

Historically, in common law countries, treason also covered the murder of specific social superiors, such as the murder of a husband by his wife or that of a master by his servant. Treason (i.e. disloyalty) against one’s monarch was known as high treason and treason against a lesser superior was petty treason. As jurisdictions around the world abolished petty treason, “treason” came to refer to what was historically known as high treason.

At times, the term traitor has been used as a political epithet, regardless of any verifiable treasonable action. In a civil war or insurrection, the winners may deem the losers to be traitors. Likewise the term traitor is used in heated political discussion – typically as a slur against political dissidents, or against officials in power who are perceived as failing to act in the best interest of their constituents. In certain cases, as with the Dolchstoßlegende (Stab-in-the-back myth), the accusation of treason towards a large group of people can be a unifying political message.

“THIS IS WHERE WE LIVE” AND “SO-CALLED CHRISTIANS” HAVE BEEN “FOOLED/LED INTO THE DITCH(ES) OF LIES/LIARS/INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS/AND SATANIC/DEMONIC/ELECTRONIC CULT WORSHIPERS”!!!

WHAT’S REAL AND WHAT’S TRUE/TRULY FAKE??

THIS IS STILL THE “BEST WAY TO SAY” THAT ITS TIME TO “GET BACK TO LIFE; AND BACK TO REALITY”!!!!

Back to Life

Soul II SoulBack to life, back to reality
Back to life, back to reality
Back to life, back to reality
Back to the here and now, yeahShow me how decide
What you want from me
Tell me, maybe I could be there for youHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meBack to life, back to the present time
Back from a fantasy, yes
Tell me, now, take the initiative
I’ll leave it in your hands until you’re readyHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meHow ever do you need me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you need meI live at the top of the block
No more room for trouble and fuss
Need a change, a positive change
Look, it’s me writing on the wallHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meBack to life, back to the day we have
Let’s end this foolish game
Hear me out, don’t let it waste away
Make up your mind so I know where I standHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need meHow ever do you want me
How ever do you need me
How ever do you want me
How ever do you need me

Isaiah 5:20

King James Version

²⁰ Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!